Why freedom is a war-cry in Kashmir

 

Syed Zafar Mehdi

On December 17 2012, a 23-year-old college-going girl was gang-raped and ruthlessly assaulted in a moving bus in New Delhi. The incident shook the nation. The irate protesters  mostly youth, poured out on the streets the very next day. As the victim battled for her life on a hospital bed, people across India protested and prayed simultaneously. She was air-lifted to Singapore for advanced treatment and finally succumbed to her injuries there after 13 days. Young protestors in Delhi had to face the wrath of police as they marched on heavily-fortified Raisina Hill, housing President’s official residence. Tear-gas shells, water cannons and lathis were employed against the visibly enraged mob of protesters who were demanding death to the accused and stringent law to deal with rapists.

The degree of outrage and anger against the rape of that girl is heartening. However, this is not an isolated case, and certainly not the first time such a gruesome incident has taken place. It has only brought back the haunting memories of Kunan Poshpora, a small hamlet in North Kashmir, where at least 53 women were gang raped on February 23, 1991 by Indian security forces. Two decades on, there has been no action against the accused cops from 4th Rajputana Rifles.

 

The 2009 Shopian double rape and murder case also comes to mind. wo young women, Aasiya and Neelofar, were abducted, gang-raped and murdered in mysterious circumstances on the intervening night of May 29 and 30, 2009 at Bongam, Shopian in North KashmirLocals accused the CRPF personnel of the crime, but the case was carefully shelved to avoid embarrassment for security forces.

images azadi

Crimes, perpetrators and inaction

On December 06, 2012, International Peoples’ Tribunal on Human Rights and Justice in Indian-administered Kashmir (IPTK) released a report – ‘Alleged Perpetrators – Stories of Impunity in Jammu and Kashmir’. The report, a painstaking research work of two years, using data from official state documents and witness testimonies, examines 214 cases of gross human rights abuses and the role of 500 alleged perpetrators. Among the 500 perpetrators include 235 army personnel, 123 paramilitary personnel, 111 Jammu and Kashmir Police personnel and 31 government-backed associates. The list of alleged perpetrators has many heavyweight designations, including two Major Generals, three Brigadiers, nine Colonels, three Lieutenant Colonels, 78 Majors and 25 Captains. The list also includes 37 senior officials of the federal paramilitary forces, a retired Director General of the Jammu and Kashmir Police, and a serving Inspector General. “Cases presented in this report reveal that there is a policy not to genuinely investigate or prosecute the armed forces for human rights violations,” said the press handout by IPTK.

Taking serious cognizance of the report, Amnesty International called for an ‘impartial probe into the allegations of human rights violations made in a report’. The Asian Federation Against Enforced Disappearances (AFAD) said ‘the study clearly points to a high level of command decision, given the involvement of top ranking officers of the Indian Army, the highest of them a Major General. If used to the full, it will go a long way towards the unveiling of the truth, the prosecution of perpetrators, reparation for victims and the non-repetition of human rights violations in this paradise lost”. However, the findings of report, notwithstanding their gravity and seriousness, have gone largely unnoticed in mainstream Indian media.

In a state of perpetual denial

The sense of alienation between the people of Kashmir and India has reached its climax. However, people in New Delhi and other metropolis of India still have one prickly question on their mind which occasionally brings out their patriotic outrage against anything they perceive as ‘anti-national’ and dangerous to the ‘sovereignty’ of India. That is the question of ‘azadi’ or ‘freedom’.

For the people in India, the definition of ‘azadi’ still appears hazy. “What do Kashmiris want,” asks a journalist friend of mine from South Delhi. “Azadi,” I tell him. He appears bemused, almost fuming.  “But what does azadi mean to you. Aren’t you free already,” he asks with a puckered brow. “If living under the specter of terror and breathing through the barrel of Kalashnikov is what you call azadi, then we are more azad (free) than you,” I retort. He retreats, with exasperated looks.

Azadi is not a strange beast or a hydra-headed monster. It means people demand their basic and fundamental right to lead a dignified life. It means breaking free from the specter of repressive laws which provide police and armed forces with extraordinary powers. Azadi means justice for one lakh Kashmiris killed in last two decades of conflict. It means justice for 7000 odd custodial killings, and 3700 odd people who have vanished under mysterious circumstances in past two decades.

Kashmir happens to be the most militarized zone in world, more than Iraq and Afghanistan. The struggle for the right to self determination has a long history, because Kashmir has always been ruled by ‘outsiders’.

Massacres and culture of impunity

The people of India need to be reminded of the then PM Jawaharlal Nehru’s promise at Lalchowk Srinagar, where he spoke to a large gathering accompanied by his friend Shiekh Abdullah. They should be reminded about umpteen UN resolutions on Kashmir and how successive regimes in New Delhi made mockery of them. Speaking of killings, massacres, carnage; they need to be told about Gaw Kadal Massacre on January 20, 1990. Central Reserve Police Force had opened fire on a group of unarmed Kashmiri protesters, including women and children, leaving over 200 people in pools of blood. Author Victoria Schofield calls it the “worst massacre in Kashmiri history” in her book ‘Kashmir in Conflict: India, Pakistan and the Unending War’. This massacre took place just a day after New Delhi sent Jagmohan as Governor to Kashmir on January 19, 1990.

images gaw kadal

Chhatisingpora massacre that took place on 20 March 2000 is another blot on the face of India. Around 15 armed personnel entered the village of Chattisinghpora in Anantnag district, lined up 34 men and boys belonging to Sikh community in an open field and mowed them down in cold blood. This happened on the eve of the then US President Bill Clinton’s visit to India. And worse, none of those army personnel were prosecuted in the case.

Five days after the Chattisinghpora massacre, a battalion of Indian troopers gunned down seven men in Pathribal village of Anantnag district, dubbing them as ‘foreign militants’ responsible for Chhatisingpora. This year on 19th March 2012, CBI informed that the fake encounter at Pathribal “were cold-blooded murders and the accused officials deserve to be meted out exemplary punishment.”

Zakoora massacre happened on March 1, 1990, when thousands of protestors decided to approach United Nations Military Observer Group office in Srinagar, next to CM’s Gupkar Road residence, to protest against the policies of governor Jagmohan. They got bullets from army, leaving 26 dead. Tengpora massacre took place on the same day, when 21 more Kashmiri people, totally unarmed, were killed by Indian army at a bus stop in Tengpora, Srinagar. The dead included 5 women. There is also Handwara Massacre, when nine civilians were shot dead by BSF on January 25 1990 in frontier district of Handwara. The list goes on.

The new ‘intafada’

The year 2009-10 brought back the memories of 90s when resistance movement was at its peak. Many people were killed, most of them innocents. A 45-year old physically challenged Abdul Rashid Reshi was shot dead on January 07 near CM’s high-security bungalow in Srinagar. A 17-year old Amina fell to bullets on May 12, 2009 in ‘exchange of fire’. Neelofar (24) and Asiya Jan (17) of Shopian were raped and murdered on May 29 2009. A B.A. final year student Amina Masoodi of Doolipora Trahgam was killed inside her house during the night intervening of July 8 and 9, 2009. Inayat (16) was shot dead on January 08, 2009 followed by Wamiq (13) on January 31 and Zahid (16) on February 05. Habibullah Khan of Handwara, a beggar, was mowed down on April 13 and passed off as ‘veteran militant’. Shehzad Ahmed and Riyaz Ahmed of Rafiabad were mowed down in fake encounter in Machil and dubbed as ‘militants’.

Tufail Ahmad (17), whose death gave fresh impetus to the spirit of rebellion among Kashmiris, was killed while returning from tuitions on June 11 2010. Asif Ahmed Rather, a nine year old from Baramulla was literally bludgeoned to death. Mukhtar Ahmad Sheikh, 68, a father of five children, including three daughters was shot dead by Army’s 21 Rashtriya Rifles in the Bawan Watser forest area. Army said the sexagenarian man was killed in an encounter between militants and the army. These were followed by even more brutal killings of Ishtiyaq Ahmed Khanday (15) on June 29, 2010, Shajat-ul-Islam (18) on same day, Muzaffar Bhat (17) and Abrar Ahmad (18) on July 06. An 11 year old Irshad Parray of Islamabad fell to pallets fired by police while protesting against the earlier incident of women’s beating by police and CRPF. One injured boy died on his mother’s lap near Batamallo bus stand during curfew on August 2010. And the list goes on. There were more than 150 killings, mostly teenagers, in 2009-10 alone.

3333 massacre

Vanished into thin air?

Nazima Jan of Tathmulla Uri in Baramulla district has been waiting for her “missing” three brothers, since past one and a half decades. She, alongwith the kith and kin of other missing persons, gather in Partap Park Srinagar on the 10th and 28th day of every month to register their protest against enforced custodial disappearances in Kashmir. They have formed Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP).

A 48-page report ‘Half Widow, Half Wife’ by the Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP) speaks about the conundrum of ‘missing versus disappeared’. It says the fact that men have disappeared and not been declared dead has left thousands of children and women (half-widows) in a hopeless state without no legal protection.

Activists claim that close to 8,000 people have gone missing in the region over the last 20 years. The International People’s Tribunal on Human Rights and Justice (IPTK) in Kashmir in its report released in December 2009 revealed 2,700 unmarked graves containing more than 2,900 bodies in more than 50 villages in northern Kashmir. Due to some operational constraints, it was confined to few select villages so they suspect the number could be much higher. In August 2011, the 11-member police investigation team of the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) verified 2156 unidentified bodies in unidentified graves in Bandipora, Baramulla, Kupwara, and Handwara districts.

Arrested, persecuted and released

The tales of horror do not stop in Kashmir. Many Kashmiris have faced the music in different states of India. There have been many instances where Kashmiri journalists, academics, artists and students have been abused, vilified, and targeted by state and its agencies outside Kashmir.

Syed Maqbool Shah (32) was 17 when he was arrested by Delhi Police on 17 June 1996 in Lajpat Nagar. He was holidaying in Delhi when was arrested in connection with the Lajpat Nagar bombings of 21 May 1996. He was sent to Tihar Jail, and released on 8 April 2010 after almost 14 years, due to ‘lack of sufficient evidence’.

Mirza Iftikhar Hussain (40) used to run a Kashmiri handicrafts shop in Mussoorie (UP), and had come to Delhi when he was arrested in Bhogal on 14 June 1996. He was also accused of involvement in the 21 May 1996 Lajpat Nagar blasts. He was set free on April 08, 2010 after 13 years, 10 months and 25 days, again for want of foolproof evidence.

Shakeel Ahmad Khan had a government job in Srinagar. He had come to Delhi when he was arrested on 24 April 1992 in Lajpat Nagar for allegedly plotting to kill some BJP politicians. He was released in August 2002 after serving almost 10 years behind bars, again for lack of evidence.

afzal-guru_052711104203

Delhi University Professor SAR Geelani was arrested in the 2001 Parliament attack case and was later acquitted after some human rights activists took up his case. There are still more questions than answers in the case of Afzal Guru, who has been sentenced to death in Parliament attack case, to satisfy the ‘collective conscience of the society’. What makes the ‘death sentence’ gross and disproportionate, according to legal experts, is the fact that Guru’s case is riddled with many loopholes and he was not defended properly at the trail court.

The case of Kashmiri journalist Iftikhar Gilani is most peculiar. He was arrested in June 2002 for allegedly ‘violating’ the Indian Official Secrets Act 1923. He was accused of being a Pakistani spy, after police found some ‘documents’ from his possession, which otherwise are freely available on internet and could be downloaded easily. He spent nine months behind bars and was finally acquitted for lack of evidence.

Tailpiece:

Life in Kashmir remains crippled. The political leadership has failed and economy is in shatters. No matter what the tourism ministry says, normalcy seems like a far-fetched dream right now. The fate of the strife-torn state hangs in balance. As the youth on streets would tell you, it is no more about the political or economic packages, the half-hearted pronouncements, or the cosmetic confidence-building-measures. The resounding war-cry on the streets of Kashmir is ‘azaadi’, which translates into complete freedom from the specter of oppression, repression, humiliation, and occupation. That is a war-cry.

 

Disability-friendly workplaces

Syed Zafar Mehdi

Employment is about self-expression. For disabled persons, it is an expression of their inherent
abilities, dignified acceptance in society and normalization of their lives. However, in the
past, while some have struggled to attract decent jobs, others have faced the axe owing to
their disability. A small minority of social intellectuals and activists working for the rights of
disabled people have vociferously challenged exclusionary and stigmatising social processes
that hinder the growth and progress of people with disabilities. And, over the years, there has
been a perceptible change in the mindset of people towards persons with disabilities. Many top
companies have also thrown open their doors for these differently-abled persons, giving birth to
the concept of disability-friendly workplaces.getimage.dll

Being ‘disability-friendly’ implies accommodating thewide-ranging needs of these workers,
enhancing their accessibility requirements and ensuring a more inclusive and productive work
environment. It can also extend to providing flexibility at workplace, in terms of part-time work
or compressed work schedules, which can help them manage their needs better.

Commitment to provide equal opportunity

Industry observers believe the organisations that incorporate disability matters in corporate
diversity policies create a healthy ambience at workplace. It often leads to superior leadership,
greater innovation and higher productivity. Many companies have started to underline their
commitment to provide equal opportunity to people with disabilities in their recruitment policy.

To assert the company’s commitment towards its diversity initiatives, France based world’s
leading hotel operators Accor made a formal declaration in 2007 to combat discrimination at
workplace. In the declaration, the company pledged to fight all forms of discrimination based
on ‘origins, gender, family situation, health, disability, beliefs, political opinions, union activity,
ethnic preferences, nationality, race, or religion’. Cisco Systems Inc., one of the world’s largest
technology corporations, commits to ‘recruit, promote, reassign, and train people regardless of
race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, or nationality’.

Ernst & Young’s commitment to shun discrimination is underpinned by a comprehensive policy
statement to ensure that employees are not treated unjustly on the grounds of ‘sex, marital status,
race, ethnic and national origin, disability, religion, sexual orientation, age and trade union
membership or non‐membership’. Japan-based Hondo Motors’ policy states that the company
will not display favoritism on the basis of ‘place of birth, nationality, beliefs, religion, sex, race,

ethnic origin, age, physical or mental disability, legally protected medical condition, hobbies,
education, or status within society’. IBM cites disability in a number of company policies,
such as global employment standards policy, workforce diversity policy, diverse business
relationships policy etc.

Accomodating the disabled

The phenomenon of disability represents wide array of conditions with different peculiarities
that require unique accommodation. Accommodating persons with disabilities is a challenge
that can yield fruitful results. For instance, people with hearing impairment may require sign
language interpretation, while persons with other impairments do not. Visually-impaired people
need Braille, while persons with other impairments do not. Impairments are not constant and
differ from one person to other, and degree of impairment can also change over the course of
employment, so employers need to accommodate them accordingly.

However, the work related challenges resulting out of complex economic and social processes
demonstrate the changing circum-stances that can hamper the prospects for people with
disabilities. The shortcomings faced by disabled persons are due to the combination of factors
that affect different people differently.

Benefits of disabled friendly workplace

Reams of research on the benefits of disabled-friendly workplaces have found that persons
with disability often make better employees. Recruiting persons with disability can improve the
image of organisation in society and strengthen the employer brand. It leads to higher morale of
workers, which in turn reflects in the productivity and performance.

Persons with disabilities are perceived to be more reliable and committed to the organisation,
resulting in higher retention rates and relatively low costs of training and recruitment. Hiring
disabled persons, more importantly, means promoting a diverse workforce.

Top companies with disabled friendly environment

Many top companies have realised that persons with disabilities represent an untapped source
of skills and talent. As productive, dynamic, and loyal employees, they are an asset to the
organisation.

IBM recruited its first employee with disability in 1914. After that, it employed many disabled
veterans of World War I. Among the slew of measures taken by company to create a disability-
friendly workplace includes establishing a training centre in New York for disabled people in
1943. In 1972, in collaboration with US government, IBM started a computer teaching and
training programme to offer job-oriented training to people with physical disabilities.

UK-based leading retailer of clothing, food and home products, Marks & Spencer works actively
with many organisations to offer job opportunities to persons with disabilities. In 2004, the

company launched Marks & Start, a work experience programme designed for jobless youth,
destitute, and disabled persons.

Microsoft’s CrossDisability Employee Resource Group (XD-ERG) represents employees with
disabilities such as hearing impairment, visual impairments, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder, and dyslexia. Its prime objective is to enable employees attain their full potential
through adequate representation, inclusion and accommodation.

For Nokia, diversity is a critical component of business. Its largest factory in Hungary is taking
the lead in hiring people with disabilities in partnership with non‐governmental organisations.

For Sodexo, the initiatives for the welfare of persons with disabilities vary from country to
country. However, the goals and objectives are same – to enhance the efficiency and productivity
of persons with disabilities by providing the requisite training and workplace accommodations.
In the United States, Sodexo has established a Disabilities Task Force to raise awareness about
disabilities within the company.

The way ahead

Organisations in India need to walk the talk to pave way for the disability-friendly workplaces
and promote an inclusive culture and diversity. The top management must show far-sightedness
and commitment. The disability clause should be categorically enshrined in the policies,
procedures, and practices. There should not be any discrimination on any ground, and workers
with disabilities must be employed at all levels of the organisation. It is also important to educate
employees about disabilities, and provide training to disabled employees to help them realize
their full potential. Hiring and selection procedures should be non-discriminatory in nature,
and employers must show willingness to provide help to individuals with disabilities during the
hiring process.